Et on peut signer en bas…
(CLIQUER SUR L’IMAGE) :
https://mounties4freedom.ca/
Les commentaires de Daniel Pilon: https://www.facebook.com/annieclaude.bouchard.98/posts/10159319333446253
Et on peut signer en bas…
(CLIQUER SUR L’IMAGE) :
https://mounties4freedom.ca/
Les commentaires de Daniel Pilon: https://www.facebook.com/annieclaude.bouchard.98/posts/10159319333446253
Cet excellent article d’opinion du Dr. René Lavigueur a été supprimé hier du journal la Presse.
EXPLICATIONS : (CLIQUER SUR L’IMAGE) :
http://www.lesmanchettes.com/societe/medias/1939-les-dilemmes-d-un-medecin-de-famille-en-temps-de-covid-19
Voici l’article original :
SOURCE :
Médecin de famille, je suis doublement vacciné et mon témoignage apporte l’éclairage d’un homme de terrain aux prises avec les dilemmes quotidiens particuliers qu’occasionne la crise du coronavirus.
La pensée unique et la peur qu’ont entraînées 19 mois de campagne médiatique ont divisé cruellement et inutilement les familles, les professionnels, bref la société tout entière. Cette pensée interdit toute discussion et tout débat par peur de représailles.
Un code de déontologie mis à mal
Le médecin de famille est soumis à un code de déontologie qui comprend des articles visant la protection du public et le respect du droit des patients à un consentement libre et éclairé.
Je suis, en tant que médecin de famille, placé devant des choix déchirants lorsque l’application de ces principes entre en conflit avec la gestion politique de cette pandémie, gestion préconisée par les autorités de santé publique et soutenue par le Collège des médecins du Québec. Toute ma pratique s’est articulée autour d’un souci constant : celui de ne pas nuire. Mon allégeance première est envers la mère, l’enfant et toute personne qui sollicite mon aide. On me consulte donc au sujet de la vaccination des enfants, de la sécurité du vaccin, de l’obligation vaccinale, des complications du vaccin.
Je constate au quotidien, tout comme les psychologues et les travailleurs sociaux, les dommages non seulement de la COVID-19, mais aussi de sa gestion.
Pour respecter le droit de mes patients à un consentement éclairé, voici ce que je crois devoir leur dire concernant la vaccination des enfants :
« Acceptez-vous que votre enfant reçoive le vaccin à ARN messager ? Ce vaccin est différent de tous les vaccins que vous connaissez. Ce vaccin comporte une balance risques/bénéfices incertaine chez les enfants en bonne santé et sans facteurs de risque. Le fabricant ignore les effets à long terme de son produit. L’Organisation mondiale de la santé ne le recommande pas et il n’est pas encore approuvé par la Food and Drug Administration aux États-Unis, ni par Santé Canada pour les 5 à 11 ans. Il est offert aux enfants dans l’espoir de contribuer à limiter la contamination des personnes âgées et/ou vulnérables par la COVID-19. Acceptez-vous que votre enfant reçoive ce vaccin ? »
On aurait pu ajouter que la mortalité chez les enfants âgés de 0 à 9 ans est nulle depuis le début de la pandémie (données de l’INSPQ). La balance risques/bénéfices est donc a priori difficile à défendre pour cette tranche d’âge, tout comme chez les jeunes en général.
J’aimerais bien pouvoir dire cela librement, sans risque de représailles. Le médecin, comme les parents, devrait pouvoir défendre le « principe de précaution » et la prudence en ce qui concerne la santé des enfants.
Les vaccinés, tout comme les non-vaccinés, peuvent héberger et transmettre le virus. Les enfants sont de mauvais propagateurs du virus dans la communauté. Alors, comment justifier la vaccination imposée aux enfants ?
Il y a un grave problème éthique à forcer la vaccination chez des enfants sains dans le but hypothétique d’en faire profiter un autre segment de la population (les personnes âgées avec comorbidités). Les enfants n’ont-ils pas déjà assez souffert ? Pourquoi risquer de compromettre davantage leur santé ?
Les parents ont eu le choix douloureux de signer l’autorisation vaccinale de leurs enfants ou de les condamner à l’exclusion et au rejet. C’est donc une vaccination obligatoire, mais qui ne s’affiche pas comme telle. Or, notre code de déontologie impose un « consentement libre » pour toute décision, c’est-à-dire sans pression, menace ou contrainte. Comment puis-je conseiller le parent inquiet qui ne veut pas que son enfant soit marginalisé ? Que gagne-t-on avec cette vaccination ? Pourquoi punir l’enfant non vacciné ?
Un vaccin qui échappe à toute surveillance
Je traite des adultes avec des séquelles graves à la suite de l’administration de ce vaccin. Pour une population de 11 300 habitants, j’ai déjà signalé à la Santé publique deux décès, des cas d’ACV, de paralysie de Bell, de saignements menstruels, de palpitations et de fatigue extrême consécutifs à l’administration des vaccins.
Des milliers de morts, des dizaines de milliers d’effets secondaires graves dus au vaccin sont rapportés à travers le monde. Pourquoi ignorer, au Québec, les risques associés à ces vaccins ? Si le fabricant n’est responsable de rien, s’il a pu négocier une immunité judiciaire, alors qui sera responsable des dommages bien réels de ces vaccins ?
Despite the COVID-19 vaccines having been promoted as safe and effective by legacy media, many health care workers are refusing to take them, and those who openly speak out about their concerns get censored by Big Tech companies or kicked off their platforms.
Some nurses and doctors are refusing vaccine mandates even if their refusal will cost them their jobs.
The Epoch Times reached out to some of these health care professionals to see why.
Emily Nixon is a registered nurse who has been working in the health industry for 18 years. When her employer, MaineHealth, announced that it would make the vaccine mandatory, she quickly organized a group called The Coalition for Healthcare Workers Against Medical Mandates and filed a lawsuit.
“Thousands of health care workers have and will be losing their jobs. The already weak health care infrastructure of Maine will not withstand this devastating loss of staff. Life will be lost. Care is already being rationed. We have been experiencing a media blackout in this state,” Nixon said.
“Speaking from my point of view, an intelligent, healthy, and empowered health care professional that takes excellent care of herself, it is an insult to expect that I would accept an injection of unknown substance and efficacy and provide an example to the great people that I serve that they too should submit their power over to pharmaceutical companies—convicted felons—in an effort to put a band-aid on the gaping wound of reality.
“It is unconscionable to mandate injections without exemption, especially when the injection is a brand new medical product still undergoing its first year of study. Breakthrough cases are not properly reported on. We know this vaccine is ‘leaky.’ The safety and effectiveness of this vaccine has not been proven. There are other safe and alternative treatments. It is impossible to give fully informed consent without long-term, unbiased data. Threatening our jobs is blatant coercion. Our God-given right to bodily integrity and personal autonomy has been stripped with these mandates and we will not stand for it,” Nixon said.
Jaclyn Zubiate, who was working for Southern Maine Health Care, loved her job as a nurse practitioner.
“I did not take the vaccine, even though I will be terminated … Now with the data that we have, we know that the survival rate is quite high. Over the last 18 months, I have only sent one patient to the ER in respiratory distress. COVID has no distinguishing features among other viruses like other diseases that we have vaccines for. Why would I need a vaccine for something with a 99 percent survival rate that does not have any distinguishable features?” said Zubiate.
“Health care workers are not taking it because they know that the side effects are real. In urgent care, I have seen myocarditis, cellulitis, [and] unusual neurological symptoms, among a variety of other side effects. I have seen people very ill post-vaccine, and then go on to test positive. The positivity rate for contracting COVID on the vaccinated is very high per the recent studies and what I am seeing in my clinic. A vaccine should work, and it is not working. It should be tested for years on something other than humans before we call it ‘safe and effective.’ There have been over 15,000 deaths from the vaccine that the media is not talking about. I will never take that risk on myself,” Zubiate said.
Jessica Mosher has been a registered nurse for more than a decade. She is a mother of four and a veteran of the United States Navy who lost her job for refusing the shots.
She was a nursing supervisor, patient observer manager, and nurse program director at Redington-Fairview General Hospital.
“Protecting my health and staying true to my religious convictions will always be my choice over a job. The scriptures promise that ‘as long as the earth remains, there will be seedtime and harvest’; this side of heaven, we have an abundance of employment options, but only one life,” Mosher said.
“I have a master’s degree in nursing and am employed as a professor of nursing research and evidence-based practice. I am skilled in collecting and analyzing data and in drawing conclusions. I did not rely on the media, government, or Big Tech for any of my health care decisions prior to COVID-19 and I have no plans to change course. The data speaks for itself related to the harm these experimental vaccines have caused and the lack of studies that have been conducted.
“What I have seen as a nurse and what others have shared post-vaccination seals the deal. The virus, like the cold and flu, does not have a cure. However, it has an almost 100 percent survival rate. Those pushing the vaccine are following the money. I am following the science. Health care workers do not walk away from their passion or stable salary to be difficult. The amount of people willing to be fired should be cause for alarm in and of itself,” she said.
John Lewis worked for a large hospital in southern Maine.
He is pro-life and believes that all life is precious.
“Knowing all three available vaccines were either tested, developed, or produced using fetal cell lines from elective abortions, I could not in good conscience violate my deeply held beliefs. Anticipating I would be able to file a religious exemption, it is hard to accept [that] I’m not being afforded an exemption based on my duties after considering I am a remote worker and do not interact with patients,” Lewis said.
“Outside of medical or religious exemptions, many health care workers consider the risk-benefits of getting the vaccine. It is the same approach to providing patient care, where the patient is allowed informed consent. Many of the health care workers have natural immunity. Others do not feel there is enough long-term research into adverse effects. Also, these health care workers see with their own eyes what is happening in hospitals, which isn’t necessarily in line with the narrative,” Lewis said.
Heather Sadler, a registered nurse, also loves to be a nurse, but she said that her and her family’s health are much more important than her paycheck.
“This is new vaccine (if you want to call it that) technology that has NEVER been deployed successfully, and has no data regarding long-term effects, not to be confused with ‘side effects’ as the general public seems to be hung up on. I have always been someone who analyzes my health care choices through the lens of risk-benefit ratio. Knowing what I know about COVID (and I’ve done a lot of research), I do not fall into any of the high-risk for severe illness/death categories: age over 65, obese, heart disease, diabetes, chronic lung conditions, and immunocompromised. For me and my immediate family, there is greater risk of having a side effect, or long-term effect from injecting a virtually unknown substance into ourselves,” Sadler said.
“I am a nurse in Oncology/Hematology, and I’m seeing that we are experiencing an increase in hospitalizations/referrals for clotting and bleeding disorders. For one example, in one week, we had two patients in the hospital who were diagnosed with a rare clotting disorder … And this happened twice in one week in rural central Maine. The only common factor, a COVID shot three days prior in each case. Was this reported to the CDC? I do not know.
“Only 4 of the roughly 20 to 25 people I’ve known personally who have tested positive for COVID recently have been unvaccinated. Yes, unvaccinated. The majority of the people around me who have tested positive in the past three months have been fully vaccinated. Why would I want to risk side effects or long-term effects of the shot if I can still contract and spread this virus? It’s just not logical. Those two examples clearly blow their theory that ‘it’s safe and effective’ out of the water,” Sadler said.
“I am in constant communication with other health care workers in the state of Maine and none of us are seeing the ‘surges’ that the general public is told is happening.”
“This is America! I have every right to make an educated decision regarding my health care. No matter what you are told, what I do has no direct effect on you,” Sadler said.
Sherri Thornton was a Maine SAFE Advisory Board member and chair and has been a nurse for 45 years.
She was planning to retire but wanted to work until the end of the year; however, when she saw the mandate coming, she decided to retire earlier.
“I believe that freedom is the most important thing in life outside of salvation. No one has the right to tell me what I can or can not do with my body except the Lord. The vaccines have been produced with fetal tissue, and I am staunchly opposed to abortion,” Thornton said.
“The components of the vaccines are not safe. There are many side effects that cause more harm than the coronavirus. It doesn’t protect against the variants. … Vaccinating everyone will not gain herd immunity and will only cause more variants to which those without natural immunity will succumb,” Thornton said.
Three other health care workers that are against the vaccine mandates reached out to The Epoch Times but didn’t want to have their names or employers disclosed.
The province is implementing a user-friendly ‘snitch line’ reporting system online, for citizens who wish to report individuals or businesses breaking COVID-19 rules or mandates.
(CLICK ON IMAGE) :
Saskatchewan sets up COVID snitch line, detainment centres and enforcement team
The province is implementing a user-friendly ‘snitch line’ reporting system online, for citizens who wish to report individuals or businesses breaking COVID-19 rules or mandates.
1. Alabama Governor Signs Order to Fight Federal Vaccine Mandate
Alabama Governor Signs Order to Fight Federal Vaccine Mandate
Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) signed an executive order Monday to demand state agencies do not comply with federal coronavirus vaccine mandates. Executive Order 724 declares the “nonenforcement of federal COVID-19 vaccination mandates” effective immediately across the state.
2. Abp. Viganò warns US bishops about COVID jab: The Great Reset wants ‘billions of chronically ill people’
Abp. Viganò warns US bishops about COVID jab: The Great Reset wants ‘billions of chronically ill people’ – LifeSite
The silence of so many cardinals and bishops, along with the inconceivable promotion of the vaccination campaign by the Holy See, represents a form of unprecedented complicity that cannot continue any longer.
VIDEO (CLICK ON IMAGE) :
LOVE YOUR TYRANNY !!!
1.New Zealand prime minister: ‘We are your single source of truth’
New Zealand prime minister: ‘We are your single source of truth’
To help LifeSite continue sharing videos on important and vital topics, consider donating here: https://give.lifesitenews.com/?utm_source=NZPrime071621 Sign-up for LifeSite’s video newsletter here: ht
2. New Zealand Prime Minister says COVID mandate is meant to create class system: ‘That is what it is’
New Zealand Prime Minister says COVID mandate is meant to create class system: ‘That is what it is’ – LifeSite
‘Actually, what’s become clear to me is that [vaccine certificates] are not just a tool to drive up vaccines, they’re a tool for confidence.’
3.VIDEO : 40% Of NZ Jobs For VAXXED ONLY: Ardern Announces New Zealand Gov’s Next Wave Of Evil Incrementalism
40% Of NZ Jobs For VAXXED ONLY: Ardern Announces New Zealand Gov’s Next Wave Of Evil Incrementalism
Join our leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, Rumble, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon. Add me on these great platforms: https://odysee.com/@TimT…
(click on image) :
‘Stop the Shot: Caught on Tape’ – LifeSite
The press conference video will be available here on Wednesday, October 27th at 12pmET.
“Caught on Tape” Explosive Press Conference event presenting shocking recordings of hospital executives discussing coordinated plans to restrict fluids and nutrition for hospitalized COVID patients, suppression of all visitation for COVID patients while in hospital, denial of vital medicines and more. Actual prisoners in America are given more rights than COVID patients in America’s hospitals.
Join us Wednesday, October 27 at NOON Eastern Time for “Stop the Shot! Caught on Tape…” Video Press Conference live-streamed by LifeSiteNews, and multiple livestream platforms. For a link to participate, email Info@TruthforHealth.org.
Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD, President and CEO of the Truth for Health Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity, moderates the Press Conference, featuring Attorney and Patient Advocate Ali Shultz, exposing Arizona hospital CEOs’ collusion harming patients.
Constitutional and Civil Rights Attorney Lauren Martel describes abusive behaviors toward COVID patients, different standards for PCR tests for vaccinated vs unvaccinated ER patients, and the major medical care neglect leading to multiple patient deaths in South Carolina hospitals.
Shultz and Martel are members of the Foundation’s Legal Advisory Council, working with the Foundation’s medical team in the trenches dealing with hospital abuses as they assist family members who are desperate to get their loved ones out of the hospital to save their lives.
LifeSite co-founder John-Henry Westen will provide introductory remarks. Additional presenters include Dr. Peter McCullough, Attorney Thomas Renz, mental health professionals and family members of patients who died after being denied requested medical treatments.
Shocking medical tyranny stories show how COVID patient’s rights are violated daily, discriminated against, psychologically abused, and held in isolation with chemical and physical restraints while life-saving care is denied.
Truth for Health Foundation attorneys and physicians continue their exposé of horrific hospital violations of human rights, including violations of the Geneva Convention codes, established following World War II to prevent abuses of prisoners:
(CLICK ON IMAGE) :
DISCOLORED & DEOXYGENATED: Blood Cells Exposed To Pfizer’s Vaccine Lose Healthy Red Color & Oxygen?!
Dr. Richard Fleming presents his & Dr. Kevin McCairn’s research findings related to discoloration & deoxygenation of red blood cells exposed to Pfizer-Biontech covid19 vaccine. Full report here: https://banned.video/watch?id=617805b37031df173f85c2d…
Dr. Richard Fleming presents his & Dr. Kevin McCairn’s research findings related to discoloration & deoxygenation of red blood cells exposed to Pfizer-Biontech covid19 vaccine. Full report here: https://banned.video/watch?id=617805b370…
(CLICK ON IMAGE) :
https://rumble.com/vnmmjr-emergency-broadcast-with-guest-dr-ardis.html
Here are the important links he shared :
https://www.synergyhealthdpc.com/
For Canada : https://www.alldaychemist.com/
Get Ivermectin : https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/how-to-get-ivermectin/
His web site : https://thedrardisshow.com/
The National Institutes of Health altered a key portion of its website last week around the time it disclosed to Congress that experiments it funded in China met the definition of gain-of-function.
The federal agency, known as the NIH, had a detailed explanation of gain-of-function research on its site, noting that the term refers to any research that modifies a biological agent in a way that confers new or enhanced activity to that agent.
But the explanation was wiped between Oct. 19 and Oct. 21—possibly ahead of the NIH’s most recent disclosures on Oct. 20 about research it funded in China that increased the potency of a virus by modifying it.
The updated page now says, in its only referral to type of research, that research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPPs) “is a type of so called ‘gain-of-function’ (GOF) research.”
It claims that “the vast majority of GOF research does not involve ePPP and falls outside the scope of oversight required for research involving ePPPs.”
(FULL ARTICLE’ CLICK ON IMAGE) :
NIH Removes Language on ‘Gain-of-Function’ From Website Amid Criticism Over Funding Chinese Research
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) altered a key portion of its website last week around the time it disclosed to Congress that experiments it funded in China met the definition of gain-of-function.