INFOS LIBRES

Professeur Christian Perronne en entrevue avec Daniel Pilon

Cette vidéo essentielle d’octobre 2020 a été supprimée de toutes les plateformes sans exception aucune. Nous l’avons maintenant republiée pour vous ici.

(CLIQUER SUR L’IMAGE) :

Professeur Christian Perronne en entrevue avec Daniel Pilon (octobre 2020)

Professeur Christian Perronne en entrevue avec Daniel Pilon (octobre 2020), Cette vidéo essentielle d’octobre 2020 a été supprimée de toutes les plateformes sans exception. Nous l’avons maintenant republiée pour vous ici.

L’avocate Virginie de Araujo Recchia accuse le pouvoir d’atteinte aux intérêts fondamentaux de la nation.

Maître Virginie de Araujo Recchia

View Maître Virginie de Araujo Recchia on Odysee

2.

L’avocate Virginie de Araujo Recchia accuse le pouvoir d’atteinte aux intérêts fondamentaux de la nation.

Virginie de Araujo Recchia est avocate au barreau de Paris. Elle a rendu public un rapport de 68 pages intitulé ” Dictature 2020 ” accusant le pouvoir de ” terrorisme d’État, atteinte aux intérêts fondamentaux de la nation et crime contre l’humanité “. Ce document entend constituer la base d’une poursuite pénale contre les membres du gouvernement.

 

3. RAPPORT DICTATURE 2020

Ce document relate l’ensemble des faits reprochés de manière synthétique ainsi que les grands axes
de poursuite pénale. Ce document ne se prétend pas exhaustif et sera régulièrement mis à jour.

 

Rapport DAR.v2.pdf

No Description

 

 

 

 

VIDÉO : Anthropologie de la santé & Covid-19, l’analyse complète de Jean-Dominique Michel

 

No Title

No Description

ADRESSE ALTERNATIVE : https://video.fymq2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t42.1790-2/10000000_860311324630626_8384452717607341653_n.mp4?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=985c63&efg=eyJ2ZW5jb2RlX3RhZyI6InN2ZV9zZCJ9&_nc_ohc=bT2TgFgTySsAX8jmbBy&tn=_ODXkJV8lPQ04yQC&_nc_rml=0&_nc_ht=video.fymq2-1.fna&oh=00_AfDkJXU4bV2S2Z_uXDzZ22TfYNg6rbzzMZdlU-fdqtLXkg&oe=639528F2

 

 

LES AUTOPSIES MONTRENT QUE 93 % DES DÉCÈS CONSÉCUTIFS À LA VACCINATION SONT CAUSÉS PAR LES VACCINS

Recherche : L’analyse des autopsies montre que 93 % des décès consécutifs à la vaccination contre les cobayes sont causés par les vaccins

Une étude a montré que la grande majorité des décès survenant après la vaccination contre le Covid-19 sont en fait causés par les injections. Les recherches, menées par les docteurs Sucharit Bhakdi et Arne Burkhardt, ont porté sur 15 corps décédés dont les coroners ou les procureurs ont estimé qu’ils n’étaient pas liés à la…


Lire la suite“LES AUTOPSIES MONTRENT QUE 93 % DES DÉCÈS CONSÉCUTIFS À LA VACCINATION SONT CAUSÉS PAR LES VACCINS”

Former CBC journalist says the public broadcaster has abandoned “journalistic integrity” and embraces “cognitive dissonance”

 

1.Former CBC journalist says the public broadcaster has abandoned “journalistic integrity” and embraces “cognitive dissonance”

https://westphaliantimes.com/former-cbc-journalist-says-the-public-broadcaster-has-abandoned-journalistic-integrity-and-embraces-cognitive-dissonance/

 

2. Read Tara Henley’s Substack article in full here. 

Speaking Freely

Why I resigned from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

Speaking Freely

Why I resigned from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

For months now, I’ve been getting complaints about the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, where I’ve worked as a TV and radio producer, and occasional on-air columnist, for much of the past decade.

People want to know why, for example, non-binary Filipinos concerned about a lack of LGBT terms in Tagalog is an editorial priority for the CBC, when local issues of broad concern go unreported. Or why our pop culture radio show’s coverage of the Dave Chappelle Netflix special failed to include any of the legions of fans, or comics, that did not find it offensive. Or why, exactly, taxpayers should be funding articles that scold Canadians for using words such as “brainstorm” and “lame.”

Everyone asks the same thing: What is going on at the CBC

 

When I started at the national public broadcaster in 2013, the network produced some of the best journalism in the country. By the time I resigned last month, it embodied some of the worst trends in mainstream media. In a short period of time, the CBC went from being a trusted source of news to churning out clickbait that reads like a parody of the student press.

Those of us on the inside know just how swiftly — and how dramatically — the politics of the public broadcaster have shifted.

It used to be that I was the one furthest to the left in any newsroom, occasionally causing strain in story meetings with my views on issues like the housing crisis. I am now easily the most conservative, frequently sparking tension by questioning identity politics. This happened in the span of about 18 months. My own politics did not change.

To work at the CBC in the current climate is to embrace cognitive dissonance and to abandon journalistic integrity.

It is to sign on, enthusiastically, to a radical political agenda that originated on Ivy League campuses in the United States and spread through American social media platforms that monetize outrage and stoke societal divisions. It is to pretend that the “woke” worldview is near universal — even if it is far from popular with those you know, and speak to, and interview, and read.

To work at the CBC now is to accept the idea that race is the most significant thing about a person, and that some races are more relevant to the public conversation than others. It is, in my newsroom, to fill out racial profile forms for every guest you book; to actively book more people of some races and less of others.

To work at the CBC is to submit to job interviews that are not about qualifications or experience — but instead demand the parroting of orthodoxies, the demonstration of fealty to dogma.

It is to become less adversarial to government and corporations and more hostile to ordinary people with ideas that Twitter doesn’t like.

It is to endlessly document microaggressions but pay little attention to evictions; to spotlight company’s political platitudes but have little interest in wages or working conditions. It is to allow sweeping societal changes like lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures to roll out — with little debate. To see billionaires amass extraordinary wealth and bureaucrats amass enormous power — with little scrutiny. And to watch the most vulnerable among us die of drug overdoses — with little comment.

It is to consent to the idea that a growing list of subjects are off the table, that dialogue itself can be harmful. That the big issues of our time are all already settled.

It is to capitulate to certainty, to shut down critical thinking, to stamp out curiosity. To keep one’s mouth shut, to not ask questions, to not rock the boat.

This, while the world burns.

How could good journalism possibly be done under such conditions? How could any of this possibly be healthy for society?

All of this raises larger questions about the direction that North America is headed. Questions about this new moment we are living through — and its impact on the body politic. On class divisions, and economic inequality. On education. On mental health. On literature, and comedy. On science. On liberalism, and democracy.

These questions keep me up at night.

I can no longer push them down. I will no longer hold them back. This Substack is an attempt to find some answers.

I have been a journalist for 20 years, covering everything from hip-hop to news, food to current affairs. The through line has always been books, which I’ve engaged with at every stage of my career and at every outlet I’ve worked for. In 2020, I published my own book, Lean Out: A Meditation on the Madness of Modern Life, which was an instant bestseller in Canada.

Books have always opened new worlds for me, introduced me to new perspectives, and helped me to make sense of humanity. I need books now more than ever.

During lockdown, when I wasn’t covering COVID-19, I spent a lot of time interviewing authors for a new book I’m working on. Their boldness and insight and humour saved me from despair. These writers gave me ideas on how to move forward, and how to maintain hope. Most of all, they gave me the courage to stand up — and to speak out.

Here at Substack, I will continue the work of thinking through the current moment, focusing on non-fiction writing from around the world. I will post an essay on a books related topic every Monday, and a podcast conversation with a heterodox author every Wednesday. This will be free to all. A third post on Fridays will round up the most contrarian, controversial or overlooked new books and essays, and will be available to paid subscribers.

This work is entirely independent and entirely free from editorial control, allowing me to say the things that are not being said, and ask the questions that are not being asked. Lean Out is solely supported by subscribers. If you care about the world of ideas and value open inquiry, as I do, please consider a paid subscription.

And stay tuned for the first episode of the Lean Out podcast this Wednesday, featuring my conversation with Newsweek’s Batya Ungar-Sargon, author of Bad News: How Woke Media is Undermining Democracy.

 

Pharma, Gates, Fauci, UK Officials Accused of Crimes against Humanity at the ICC

1.

Pharma, Gates, Fauci, UK Officials Accused of Crimes against Humanity at the ICC

Activists are charging UK officials and the world’s most powerful health figures with genocide, citing a range of statistics on the effects of COVID “vaccines” and policies.

2.

“No One Has Ever Complied Their Way Out of Totalitarianism – This Is the Hill We Need to Die On” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Releases New Year’s Statement

(Jim Hoft) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is quickly becoming one of the most important voices of our time. He continues to fearlessly call out the tyranny that is ripping apart the fabric of our country.

3.

Alcyon Pléiades Extra 13: A. Fauci, génocide, arme biologique de Wuhan financée, faucisme, Mengele

Anthony Fauci, directeur de l’Institut national américain des allergies et des maladies infectieuses (NIAID) s’est engagé dans des activités scientifiques contraires à l’éthique, avec des mauvais traitements infligés aux animaux, et des expériences …